Evidence before headlines.

How to read the research

Overshove research is written for players who care about the evidence, not just the headline. We define the arithmetic and separate measured data from interpretation.

Use public analysis as context beside your own logged sample, never as a substitute for it. Your win rate, leak pattern and room economics depend on your own complete record.

We keep claims narrow on purpose. A variance calculation is a frame for uncertainty, not a reason to ignore bad play. The more serious the decision, the more your own record should sit next to any public evidence.

Publication standard

Each methods note states its observation date, scope, source fields, sample size and calculation method. A collection window is shown where the player permits it. Observed results are separated from illustrative assumptions, with privacy exclusions and material limitations beside the finding.

Before using a result, check whether the population, game, stakes, location and time window resemble the decision you are making. A result from one room or stake is not a universal benchmark.

Nothing in this library promises profit or prescribes a bankroll. Use the evidence to form a testable question, then compare it with your own complete session history. If the source record cannot be reviewed, the claim does not ship.