One blended graph can hide different results and risks. This page explains the case for separate bankrolls; it does not describe a verified live multi-bankroll feature. The current web app offers a bankroll view and bankroll export.
Live cash, online and a tournament series have different variance and different edges. Mixing them into one number lets a tournament dry spell make your cash game look broken, or an online upswing flatter a leaky live game.
A roll per context
Keeping a separate record for live cash, online play or a trip can make each result easier to interpret. A dedicated multi-bankroll workflow has not been verified in the current app.
Combined view
A combined view would need to make transfers, currency and overlap explicit. Do not assume that this planned view is available today.
What you get
→Separate bankrolls can make unlike formats easier to compare.
→The current app has a bankroll view and export.
→Dedicated separate and combined bankroll views are unverified.
How this fits the review loop
Start with a complete session record, then check the figures against the money and time you recorded. Results can identify a question for review; they do not grade an individual hand. Use your existing study method for that work while the dedicated Study and player-read workflows are in development.
Questions
Can I see multiple bankrolls together in the app?
A combined multi-bankroll view has not been verified in the current app. Use the live bankroll view and export for now.
Should live and online be separate?
Track them separately. Their variance and metrics differ, so a single blended figure misleads.